Web daddytypes.com

September 25, 2006

Art Collecting For Babies

I considered not posting about the NYT's Style section article on collecting contemporary art for kids. Not because I feel really implicated in it--though I do--but because to someone who already's hooked on collecting art, it just seems so normal.

Collecting's a really subjective thing, undertaken for a whole host of reasons. But when you get into it, your environment, life, and your own interests almost inevitably end up getting reflected in what art you buy.

When I moved from a loft downtown to a small townhouse apartment on the Upper East Side, it took me several months to realize all the art I was buying was really small. So I ended up overcompensating by buying stuff that exists only on certificate and needs to be fabricated--or that takes up an entire room. There was a stretch where almost everything I bought was black: Richard Serra, Joseph Kosuth, Felix Gonzalez-Torres, etc.

So when I've asked dealers about certain pieces over the last couple of years, they almost immediately reply, "Are you looking for something for the nursery?" As if it's the most obvious thing in the world.

The Playroom Of Modern Art [nyt]

posted September 25, 2006 10:05 AM | add to del.icio.us | digg this

1 Comment

We are definitely living in the wrong part of the country. My husband would sell a lot more art if the only socializing he had to do was with a bunch of two year olds...

Leave a comment

 

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Post relevant, constructive, and value-adding comments here.
Comments may be edited for typos and formatting, but that's about it.
Extremely negative comments may prompt an invitation to reconsider,
but the only candidates for immediate deletion are irrelevant, self-
promoting links and PR spam. Read details here.
Daddy Types will not disclose or sell your personal info. Thanks for weighing in!