August 16, 2006

Evil Flying NCAA Monkeys: You're Not On Kansas' Squad Anymore, Daddy

ESPN.com columnist and DT reader Dan Shanoff [hey, Dan!] forwarded this story which is apparently burning up the bandwidth over there: defensive tackle Eric Butler has filed a Title IX discrimination suit against the NCAA after he was repeatedly denied an eligibility waiver so he can play an additional season for Kansas University. The basis for his waiver: paternity leave.

Seems Butler's biological clock was ticking at the same time his footballogical clock was, and so he's seeking a "paternity waiver" comparable to the NCAA standard "maternity waiver" for the year he took off in 2001 to take care of his newborn daughter. The NCAA has denied multiple appeals by both Butler and KU, claiming it's actually a "pregnancy waiver," intended only for athletes who are pregnant, end of story.

Here's the statute language, as quoted in the Lawrence Journal-World :

"A member institution may approve a one-year extension of the five-year period of eligibility for a female student-athlete for reasons of pregnancy.”

...

The language of the bylaw, Butler argues, doesn’t necessarily mean the time off has to be while a female is pregnant and could be after the child is born (also known as maternity leave). No such waiver exists for a male who needs time off to care for a child after birth — referred to as “paternity leave” in the lawsuit.

Seems possible, but also kind of a stretch.

KU's offered Butler a scholarship for 2006-7 if he can get his eligibility ironed out; for in-state tuition, we're talking $2,400/semester, so a full ride's gotta be under $10-15K, max. Man wants to pummel his brains out for a year for that kind of dough, I don't see what the NCAA's being so uptight about. Unless it's setting a precedent, which'd result in waves of knocked up groupies as programs try to hold onto their star players by turning them into baby daddies.

NCAA denies appeal by Kansas athlete [usat via dt reader dan]
Butler's eligibility saga continues [ljworld.com]

2 Comments

NCAA actually stands for "Never Cared About Athletes". This is just one case in many where they show little concern for the athletes they regulate. However, there are many male athletes that father children while still in college, and this would be a very difficult precedent for them to set. Monitoring this and granting additional years of eligibility based on this would be a relatively complex task, and the NCAA is all about conformity.

Is this a paid paternity leave?

Oh, wait. College atheletes don't get paid. *wink wink*

Google DT


Contact DT

Daddy Types is published by Greg Allen with the help of readers like you.
Got tips, advice, questions, and suggestions? Send them to:
greg [at] daddytypes [dot] com

Join the [eventual] Daddy Types mailing list!


Archives

copyright

copyright 2014 daddy types, llc.
no unauthorized commercial reuse.
privacy and terms of use
published using movable type

advertisements